Zoe Williams Zoe Williams's Profile Page

Zoe Williams Zoe Williams

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Authentic PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions

By unremitting effort to improve the accuracy and being studious of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor real questions all these years, our experts remain unpretentious attitude towards our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice materials all the time. They are unsuspecting experts who you can count on. Without unintelligible content within our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study tool, all questions of the exam are based on their professional experience in this industry. Besides, they made three versions for your reference, the PDF, APP and Online software version. They do not let go even the tenuous points about the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam as long as they are helpful and related to the exam. And let go those opaque technicalities which are useless and hard to understand, which means whether you are newbie or experienced exam candidate of this area, you can use our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor real questions with ease.

To make you capable of preparing for the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam smoothly, we provide actual PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorexam dumps. Hence, our accurate, reliable, and top-ranked PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam questions will help you qualify for your ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Certification. Do not hesitate and check out ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice exam to stand out from the rest of the others.

>> Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exercise <<

2025 Realistic PECB Exam ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exercise Free PDF Quiz

PremiumVCEDump is a specialized IT certification exam training website which provide you the targeted exercises and current exams. We focus on the popular PECB Certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam and has studied out the latest training programs about PECB certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam, which can meet the needs of many people. PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor certification is a reference of many well-known IT companies to hire IT employee. So this certification exam is very popular now. PremiumVCEDump is also recognized and relied by many people. PremiumVCEDump can help a lot of people achieve their dream. If you choose PremiumVCEDump, but you do not successfully pass the examination, PremiumVCEDump will give you a full refund.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Preparing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.

Topic 2

Conducting an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.

Topic 3

Closing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q68-Q73):

NEW QUESTION # 68
A financial institution uses an AI system to approve loan applications. Recently, there have been complaints that the system disproportionately denies loans to applicants from certain minority groups.
Which core element should the institution prioritize to address these complaints?

A. Accountability
B. Privacy and Security
C. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
D. Transparency and Explainability

Answer: C

Explanation:
The most relevant core principle here isFairness and Non-Discrimination. This principle aims to ensure that AI systems do notcreate or perpetuate bias, especially in high-stakes decision-making areas such as financial services.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2andAnnex A (A.8.2.4), organizations must evaluate and manage risks related tobias, discrimination, and ethical implicationsof AI decisions.
In thePECB Lead Auditor Guide, Fairness is cited as critical in sectors likefinance, hiring, healthcare, and where decisions may adversely impact protected groups.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 (AI-related risks and impact), Annex A: Control A.8.2.4 (Bias and fairness) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Core Principles of Trustworthy AI"

NEW QUESTION # 69
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. During this first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 5, did the certification body take the necessary steps to assure the overall competence of the audit team?

A. No, the certification body should have delegated the responsibility for team selection to the audit team leader
B. Yes, the certification body identified the required competencies and selected team members accordingly
C. No, the certification body should have based team selection solely on the audit objectives

Answer: B

Explanation:
Thecertification bodymust ensure that audit team members possess the competencies necessary for the scope and complexity of the audit.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2.1states:"The certification body shall have a process for determining the competence required for personnel involved in the management and performance of audits."
* ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2 stresses that audit personnel must haveappropriate knowledge of AI systems and the management system standards.
* TheLead Auditor Training Manualalso explains:"The audit team must collectively possess all the necessary knowledge and skills determined through formal analysis by the certification body." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2.1; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.

NEW QUESTION # 70
Question:
Can ISO/IEC 42001 be integrated into an integrated management system (IMS) with ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO
9001?

A. Yes, but only under special organizational approval
B. Yes, because they share a similar standard structure
C. No, since they do not have a similar standard structure
D. No, because each management system should be implemented separately

Answer: B

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001 follows theHigh-Level Structure (HLS)(Annex SL) used by ISO management system standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001. This structural alignment allows for easy integration into a unified management system, facilitating shared documentation, policies, audits, and continual improvement processes.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Introduction, Clause 0.3; ISO Directives Part 1, Annex SL.

NEW QUESTION # 71
Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
Based on Scenario 4, does the level of detail in the audit plan adequately reflect all aspects recommended for a comprehensive risk-based approach to planning?

A. No, the audit plan should have focused on nonconformities only
B. Yes, the amount of detail provided in the audit plan reflects all the necessary aspects
C. No, detailed audit procedures should have been prioritized based on the level of risk, from lowest to highest
D. No, the audit plan should have included sufficient detail correlating with the risk of not achieving the audit objectives

Answer: D

Explanation:
The audit plan should correlate directly withthe risk of not achieving the audit objectives, meaning higher- risk areas need more scrutiny.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1 and ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.1 emphasize that audit planning must berisk-based, addressing critical risk areas sufficiently to meet audit objectives.
* Lead Auditor TrainingModule 3 highlights:"An audit plan must be sufficiently detailed based on risks to ensure critical activities receive proportionate audit attention." Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.1; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1.

NEW QUESTION # 72
A retail company wants to implement a system that can predict customer buying behavior based on their browsing history and past purchases. Which AI concept would be most suitable for developing this predictive system?

A. Machine Learning (ML)
B. Deep Learning (DL)
C. Natural Language Processing (NLP)
D. Computer Vision

Answer: A

Explanation:
Machine Learning (ML)is the most suitable AI concept in this scenario. ML focuses on developing algorithms that canlearn from structured or unstructured dataand make predictions based on historical patterns.
In this case, analyzing customerbrowsing history and purchase recordsfalls directly undersupervised learning, a subcategory of ML, which is typically used forpredictive modelingin retail (such as next-best- offer, product recommendation, or demand forecasting).
According to the PECB Lead Auditor Study Guide (Domain 1),ML is specifically referenced as the core techniquefor prediction systems, user behavior modeling, and data-driven decision-making systems.
Though Deep Learning (DL) is a subset of ML, it is often used for more complex pattern recognition tasks such as image or speech recognition, which is not explicitly required here.
Reference: PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1, Topic: "AI Concepts" - Table differentiating ML, DL, NLP, and Computer Vision ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 8.2.3 (Operational Planning and Control) - Emphasizes selecting AI techniques appropriate to the context and purpose

NEW QUESTION # 73
......

Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor preparationdumps are considered the best friend to help the candidates on their way to success for the exactness and efficiency based on our experts’ unremitting endeavor. This can be testified by our claim that after studying with our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Actual Exam for 20 to 30 hours, you will be confident to take your ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam and successfully pass it. Tens of thousands of our loyal customers relayed on our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor preparation materials and achieved their dreams.

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Testking: https://www.premiumvcedump.com/PECB/valid-ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-premium-vce-exam-dumps.html

Zoe Williams Zoe Williams

Biography

Quick Links

Support